Innovation and Development after Transition. The Case Study of Gorizia Region, Slovenia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14665/1614-4007-29-2-002Keywords:
Transition, Innovation, Regional Innovation System, Transnational Value Chains, Central and Eastern European RegionsAbstract
Central and Eastern Europe’s transition to a market economy was not homogeneous. It led to many developmental paths available for its regions. The study aims to see the results of this process and describe the contemporaneous innovation status and struggles. The analysis considered Gorizia (Slovenia) as an example of a non-capital region close to the European developmental average.
Based on data collected through an expert focus group organised with local stakeholders, the research revealed that Gorizia’s innovation process relies on endogenous and exogenous forces. The region reconstituted the economy from big producers into multiple smaller companies. Their integration into the global production chains proved essential in the transition and further development. This allowed for overcoming the issue of limited local and national resources, market size, and demand.
Similarly, it has widened regional stakeholders’ perspectives and contributed to local clusters’ development. Thus, the Regional Innovation System is heavily oriented toward foreign collaboration, especially with Italian partners. Local institutions and organisations are responsible for implementing the most significant projects within the region. Their susceptibility to the needs of the private sector strengthens the entrepreneurial origins of the innovation process. Gorizia’s innovation performance positively influences its competitive position. The value chain Flagships and original manufacturers show interest in local innovation. It is seen through the acquisition of Intellectual Property or parts of the companies to utilise in their production and innovation processes.
Downloads
References
Asheim, B. T., & Coenen, L. (2005). Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy, 34(8), 1173–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013
Asheim, B. T., & Coenen, L. (2006). Contextualizing regional innovation systems in a globalizing learning economy: on knowledge bases and institutional frameworks. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-5028-0
Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (1997). Location, agglomeration and innovation: Towards regional innovation systems in Norway? European Planning Studies, 5(3), 299–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654319708720402
Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems: The integration of local “sticky” and global “ubiquitous” knowledge. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013100704794
Asheim, B. T., Smith, H. L., & Oughton, C. (2011). Regional Innovation Systems: Theory, empirics and policy. Regional Studies, 45(7), 875–891. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.596701
Asheim, B., Coenen, L., Moodysson, J., & Vang, J. (2005). Regional Innovation System Policy : a Knowledge-based Approach. Research and Competence in the Learning Economy. Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy (CIRCLE) Lund University%5CnP.O. Box 117, S? lvegatan 16, S-221 00 Lund, SWEDEN http://www.circle.lu.se/publications%5CnISSN 1654-3149
Besednjak Valič, T. (2022). Open Innovation and Its Impacts on Interorganisational Stability: A SOFIA Perspective Addressing the Sustainable Growth in Regional Context. In Technologies and Innovations in Regional Development: The European Union and its Strategies.
Cepoi, V. (2022). Innovation Process in the Framework of Social- Fields- Approach (SOFIA): A Qualitative Assessment for Ireland and Slovenia. In Technologies and Innovations in Regional Development: The European Union and its Strategies.
Coe NM, Hess M (2011) Local and regional development: A global production network approach. In: Pike A, Rodríguez-Pose A, Tomaney J (eds) Handbook of local and regional development. Routledge, London, 128-138
Coe, N. M., Dicken, P., & Hess, M. (2008). Global production networks: Realizing the potential. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(3), 271–295. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbn002
Coe, N. M., Hess, M., Wai, H., Yeung, -Chung, Dicken, P., Henderson, J., & Europe, A. (2004). “Globalizing” regional development: a global production networks perspective Introduction and theoretical context. Trans Inst Br Geogr NS, 29, 468–484.
Coenen, L., Moodysson, J., & Asheim, B. T. (2004). Nodes, networks and proximities: On the knowledge dynamics of the Medicon Valley biotech cluster. European Planning Studies, 12(7), 1003–1018. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431042000267876
Cooke, P. (1992). Regional Innovation Systems: Competitive Regulation in the New Europe. Geoforum, 23(3), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9
Cooke, P. (2001). Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945–974. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.945
Cooke, P. (2004). The Regional Innovation System in Wales : Evolution or Eclipse ? Regional Innovation Systems, August, 1–26.
Dicken, P. (2005). Peter Dicken Tangled Webs : Transnational Production Networks and Regional Integration. SPACES, 04.
Ernst, D. (2002). Economics of Innovation and New Technology Global production networks and the changing geography of innovation systems . Implications for developing countries. Econ. Innov. New Techn., 0(0), 497–523.
Ernst, D. (2009). A New Geography of Knowledge in the Electronics Industry? Asia’s Role in Global Innovation Networks. In SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2742923
Ernst, D., & Kim, L. (2001). Global Production Networks, Knowledge Diffusion, and Local Capability Formation. A Conceptual Framework. In Economics Series (Vol. 19).
Ernst, D., & Kim, L. (2002). Global Production Networks, Knowledge Diffusion, and Local Capability Formation. A Conceptual Framework. In Economics Series (Vol. 19).
European Union. (2021). Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2021. In Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2769/55659
Fritsch, M., & Slavtchev, V. (2008). Determinants of the Efficiency of Regional Innovation Systems. Regional Studies, 45(7), 905–918. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400802251494
Gereffi, G. (2014). Global value chains in a post-Washington Consensus world. Review of International Political Economy, 21(1), 9–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2012.756414
Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290500049805
Giuliani, E., Pietrobelli, C., & Rabellotti, R. (2005). Upgrading in global value chains: Lessons from Latin American clusters. World Development, 33(4), 549–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.01.002
Henderson, J., Dicken, P., Hess, M., Coe, N., & Yeung, H. W.-C. (2002). Global Production Networks and the Analysis of Economic Development. Review of International Political Economy, 9(3), 436–464
Herzer, D., & Nunnenkamp, P. (2011). FDI and income inequality: Evidence from Europe. Kiel Working Paper, No. 1675, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW), Kiel
Isaksen, A. (2001). Building Regional Innovation Systems: Is Endogenous Industrial Development Possible in the Global Economy? Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 24(1), 101–120. http://cjrs-rcsr.org/archives/24-1/ISAKSEN.pdf
Maskell, P., & Lorenzen, M. (2004). The cluster as market organisation. Urban Studies, 41(5–6), 991–1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980410001675878
Pietrobelli, C., & Rabellotti, R. (2010). Global Value Chains Meet Innovation Systems. IDB Working Paper Series, IDB-WP-232(November). http://www.iadb.org
Radosevic, S. (2000). Regional Innovation Systems in Central and Eastern Europe: Determinants, Organizers and Alignments. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013152721632
Rainnie, A., Herod, A., & McGrath-Champ, S. (2011). Review and Positions: Global Production Networks and Labour. Competition & Change, 15(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1179/102452911x13025292603714
Roncevic, B., Modic, D. & Golob, T. (2022). Social- Fields- Approach (SOFIA) to Research on Social Change: Innovations as Social Fields. In Technologies and Innovations in Regional Development: The European Union and its Strategies.
Sachwald, F. (2008). Location choices within global innovation networks: The case of Europe. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(4), 364–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9057-8
Stuck, J., Broekel, T., & Revilla Diez, J. (2014). Network Structures in Regional Innovation Systems. European Planning Studies, 24(3), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1074984
Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2018). Regional innovation policies for new path development–beyond neo-liberal and traditional systemic views. European Planning Studies, 26(9), 1779–1795. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1457140
Yeung, H. W. chung, & Coe, N. M. (2015). Toward a Dynamic Theory of Global Production Networks. Economic Geography, 91(1), 29–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecge.12063
Yeung, H. W. Chung. (2015). Regional Development in the global economy: A dynamic perspective of strategic coupling in global production networks. Regional Science Policy and Practice, 7(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12055
Zukauskaite, E. (2018). Variety of regional innovation systems and their institutional characteristics. New Avenues for Regional Innovation Systems - Theoretical Advances, Empirical Cases and Policy Lessons, 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71661-9_3
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
The author gives permission to Transition Academia Press to publish the article in print and/or electronic format.
If/when an article is accepted for publication, Author will be asked to transfer copyright of the article to Transition Academia Press. Transition Academia Press will retain copyright of all published material and reserves the right to re-use any such material in any print and/or electronic format. Author willing to retain their copyright from the Editors might request a fair condition, on the base of a bilateral agreement.
