Becoming a Part of Regional Innovation Systems: A study of Cultural and Creative Sectors of Two Slovenian Municipalities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14666/2194-7759-11-1-7Keywords:
cultural and creative industries, innovation ecosystems, Nova Gorica, Maribor, qualitative researchAbstract
The article addresses the position and the structure of the cultural and creative industries in the two town municipalities in Slovenia – Nova Gorica and Maribor. It focuses on an in-depth overview of the role of the sector’s contribution to the innovative ecosystems of each of the municipalities. By deploying qualitative research methods (via focus groups), we provisionally conclude that CCIs can play an essential role in enhancing the innovation potential of the urban areas of Nova Gorica and Maribor. Higher education’s solid and active presence in the city seems to be one of the predominant aspects that helps mobilize awareness and contributes to the sector’s overall functioning. The need for more entrepreneurial knowledge in the Cultural and Creative sector was also emphasized.
Downloads
References
Beckert, J. (2010). How Do Fields Change? The Interrelations of Institutions, Networks, and Cognition in the Dynamics of Markets. Organization Studies, 31(5), 605–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610372184
Besednjak Valič, T. (2022). Among the Flows and Waves: Analysing innovation ecosystems of the Danubian Cultural and creative industries. Vega Press.
Besednjak Valič, T., Kolar, J., & Lamut, U. (2020). Three Scenarios of Innovation and Technology Transfer: The Case of Key Enabling Technologies in the Danube Region. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 15, 3619–3623.
Besednjak Valič, T., Kolar, J., & Lamut, U. (2021). Fighting the big bad wolf of global trends: Technology transfer between HPC centres and SMEs. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-11-2020-0162
Besednjak Valič, T., & Macur, M. (2022). Meta-Analysis of Self-Regulation Discourses in Gambling Through the Sociological Theory of Social Fields. In J. Nikkinen, V. Marionneau, & M. Egerer (Eds.), The Global Gambling Industry: Structures, Tactics, and Networks of Impact (pp. 87–111). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35635-4_7
BOP Consulting, Rosselló, P., Wright, S., & British Council. (2010). Mapping the creative industries: A toolkit. British Council. http://www.britishcouncil.org/mapping_the_creative_industries_a_toolkit_2-2.pdf
Cepoi, V., & Golob, T. (2017). Innovation Performance in the eu Comparative Perspective: The Interplay of Social Forces in the Context of National Innovation Systems. Comparative Sociology, 16(4), 555–579. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-12341433
Hojnik, B. B., & Rebernik, M. (2014). Insight into creative and cultural industries in Slovenia. 6.
InnoHPC. (2017). High-Performance Computing for Effective Innovation in the Danube Region – InnoHPC. Danube Transnational Programme. https://www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/innohpc
Kolar, J., & Besednjak Valič, T. (2021). Social aspects of technology diffusion: Danube region HPC case. Vega Press.
Lamut, U., & Macur, M. (2012). Metodologija družboslovnega raziskovanja: Od zasnove do izvedbe. Vega.
Modic, D., & Rončević, B. (2018). Social Topography for Sustainable Innovation Policy: Putting Institutions, Social Networks and Cognitive Frames in Their Place. Comparative Sociology, 17(1), 100–127. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-12341452
Murovec, N., Kavaš, D., & Bartolj, T. (2020). Statistična analiza kulturnega in kreativnega sektorja v Sloveniji 2008–2017 (p. 148). Center za kreativnost (CZK), Muzej za arhitekturo in oblikovanje. https://czk.si/gradiva/statisticna-analiza-kks-20082017/
Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society,. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4), 237–262. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165
RESTART_4Danube. (2020). Boosting cREative induSTries in urbAn RegeneratTion for a stronger Danube region – RESTART_4Danube. Danube Transnational Programme. http://www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/restart-4danube
Rončević, B., & Besednjak Valič, T. (2019). How to Think about Regional Development Agencies as a Sociologist. The Social Sciences, 14(9), 326–334. https://doi.org/10.36478/sscience.2019.326.334
Rončević, B., & Cepoi, V. (Eds.). (2022). Technologies and Innovations in Regional Development: European Union and its Strategies. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b17733
Rončević, B., Modic, D., & Golob, T. (2022). Social-Fields-Approach (SOFIA) to Research on Social Change: Innovations as Social Fields. In B. Rončević & V. Cepoi (Eds.), Technologies and Innovations in Regional Development: The European Union and its Strategies. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b17733
Throsby, D. (2010). The Economics of Cultural Policy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845253
Vogrinc, J. (2008). Kvalitativno raziskovanje na pedagoškem področju. University of Ljubljana.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
The authors when submitting their papers endorse and give permission as well to the Publisher Transition Academia Press to publish the article/paper in print and/or electronic format. Article/paper is defined as the final, definitive, and citable Version of Record, and includes the accepted manuscript in its final form, including the abstract, text, bibliography, and all accompanying tables, illustrations, data.
If/when an article is accepted for publication, Author will be asked to transfer copyright of the article to Transition Academia Press. Transition Academia Press will retain copyright of all published material and reserves the right to re-use any such material in any print and/or electronic format. Author willing to retain their copyright from the Editors might request a fair condition, on the base of a bilateral agreement.
