Ukraine’s export diversification: the impact of economic integration and disintegration

Authors

  • Olexandr Shnyrkov Institute of International Relations Kyiv National Unversity
  • Oleksandr Rogach Institute of International Relations Kyiv National Unversity
  • Nataliia Reznikova Institute of International Relations Kyiv National Unversity
  • Anton Nanavov Institute of International Relations Kyiv National Unversity

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14666/2194-7759-9-1-001

Abstract

Using the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), Gini index and Thiel index, the paper outlines the consequences of the parallel acceleration of the economic integration and disintegration processes of Ukraine with its main trade partners - the EU and Russian Federation (RF) - in 2013-2018 for the  country’s export diversification. It tests the hypothesis that the enhanced trade barriers under the economic disintegration increase commodity and spatial concentration of exports, mainly due to physical reduction in the trade volumes while the economic integration provides for export diversification: the overall impact of economic integration and disintegration on the export diversification depends on the depth and scope of the trade barriers increased and reduced and exporter’s ability to adapt to   new terms of trade. Consequently, the results of HHI computation gave evidence of the gradual diversification of the commodity and spatial structure of the Ukrainian exports. It was revealed as a result, that the commodity nomenclature had increased to the largest extent for the following positions: products of chemical and related industries; textiles and products made there of; non-precious metals and products made thereof; machinery, equipment and mechanisms, electrical supplies.  The research of the consequences of the parallel processes of trade liberalization (with the EU countries) and imposition of trade barriers (between Ukraine and RF) confirms the author’s hypothesis that the commodity and spatial concentration of the Ukrainian exports has decreased given the abovementioned terms of trade. As a result, the research highlights the ability of domestic manufacturers to adapt  to new challenges of foreign trade and compensate the losses of commodity positions at the markets in RF, whereas the demand in the  EU market is determined as a core driver for diversification of the commodity structure of the Ukrainian exports, including the ones to third countries.

 

Author Biographies

Olexandr Shnyrkov, Institute of International Relations Kyiv National Unversity

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Department of World Economy and International Economic Relations

Oleksandr Rogach, Institute of International Relations Kyiv National Unversity

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Department of International Finance

Nataliia Reznikova, Institute of International Relations Kyiv National Unversity

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Department of World Economy and International Economic Relations

Anton Nanavov, Institute of International Relations Kyiv National Unversity

Associate Professor, Department of World Economy and International Economic Relations 

References

Ali, Muhammad (2017). Determinants of Related and Unrelated Export Diversification. Journal: Economies, 5(4), 50. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies5040050

Ali, R., Alwang, J., Siegel, P. (1991) Is export diversification the best way to achieve export growth and stability? Retrieved from: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/635281468774612514/pdf/multi0page.pdf

An official website of the European Union. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/index_en

Athukorala, P. (2003). Product fragmentation and trade patterns in East Asia’. Trade and Development Discussion Paper. 2003/21. Canberra: Division of Economics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University.

Brenton, P., Newfarmer, R., Walkenhorst, P. (2009). Avenues for Export Diversification: Issues for Low-income Countries. Working paper no. 47. of Commission on growth and development. Retrieved from: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/854381468176334938/pdf/577460NWP0Box353767B01PUBLIC10gcwp047web.pdf

Burakovsky I. (2016). Ukrainian exports: results of 2016 and looking to the future. Retrieved from: http://www.ier.com.ua/ua/publications/articles?pid=5503 (in Ukr.).

Carrere, C., Strauss-Kahn, V., Cadot, O. (2011). Export Diversification: What’s behind the Hump. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 93(2). 590-605. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00078

Damuri, Y. R., Atje, R., and Gaduh, A. B. (2006). Integration and Trade Specialization in East Asia. CSIS Working Paper Series. WPE 094. 1–42. Retrieved from: http://www. csis.or.id/papers/wpe094, October 2012

DeRosa, D. A. (1991) Increasing Export Diversification in Commodity-Exporting Countries: A Theoretical Analysis. IMF Working Paper. 91/105. 29.

Duginets, G. (2017) Transformation of Foreign Trade in Ukraine in the Context of Implementation of the EU Association. Journal o f European economy Vol. 16. № 3 (62). July–September 2017. 302-314. Retrieved from: https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/api/file/viewByFileId/271882.pdf

Goryanska, T. (2012) Competitive positions of the export-oriented sectors of the Ukrainian economy. Economy of industry (1-2). 57-58. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/j-pdf/econpr_2012_1-2_19.pdf.

Hausmann, R., Hwang, J. and Rodrik, D. (2007). “What you export matters”. Journal of Economic. 12(1). 1–25.

Heyets V. Ostashko T. (2016) Implementation of the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the EU: Economic Challenges and New Opportunities: Scientific. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Institute of Economics and Prognosis of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, K. (in Ukrainian).

Hidalgo, Cesar, Hausmann, Ricardo (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106(26). 10570–10575. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900943106

Imbs, J. M., Wacziarg, R. T. (2000) Stages of Diversification. Stanford GSB Working Paper. 1653. 21.

MEDTAU, An Official Twitter of Ministry of Economic Development, Trade and Agriculture of Ukraine. Retrieved from: https://twitter.com/mineconomdev/status/1130740609138987008 (in Ukr.).

Panchenko, V. and Nanavov, A. S. (2018), “Strategic modeling of gdp growth scenarios of Ukraine in the context of the implementation of the policy of neoprotectionism: projections of economic development”, Efektyvna ekonomika, [Online], vol. 8, available at: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=6560 (Accessed 19 Feb 2020).

Pier, Paolo, Saviotti, Koen, Frenken (2008). Export variety and the economic performance of countries. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18(2), 201. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-007-0081-5

Prema-chandra, Athukorala, Nobuaki, Yamashita (2006). Production fragmentation and trade integration: East Asia in a global context. North American Journal of Economics and Finance. 17(3). 233–256. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2006.07.002

Quality, Standardization, Control: Theory and Practice (2017): Proceedings of the 17th International Scientific and Practical Conference (2017). September 04–08.2017. Odessa-Kiev: Association of Technologists and Mechanical Engineers of Ukraine (ATM). Retrieved from: http://www.atmu.net.ua/downloads/archive/sb3-17.pdf (in Ukr.).

Samen, S. (2010) A primer on export diversification: key concepts, theoretical underpinnings and empirical evidence. Growth and crisis unit World Bank Institute. Retrieved from: http://blogs.worldbank.org/files/growth/EXPORT_DIVERSIFICATION_A_PRIMER_May2010(1).pdf

State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Geographic structure of foreign trade. Retrieved from: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ (in Ukr.).

Shnyrkov O. I.,Rogach O.I., Chugaiev O.A. (2015) Russia’s Concerns for the EU-Ukraine Association: Myths and Realities. Journal Global Policy and Governance, Vol. 4, No. 2, p.33-49

Teza, Gianluca, Caraglio, Michele and Attilio L. Stella (2018). Growth dynamics and complexity of national economies in the global trade network. Journal: Scientific Reports, 8(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33659-6

Urata, S. and Ando, M. (2011), ‘Investment Climate Study of ASEAN Member Countries’, in Urata, S. and M. Okabe (eds.), Toward a Competitive ASEAN Single Market: Sectoral Analysis. ERIA Research Project Report 2010-03, 137–204. Jakarta.

White Paper: How to realize Ukraine's export potential in the context of globalization. Policy proposals for promoting the development of Ukrainian exports (2016). Retrieved from: http://www.ier.com.ua/files/publications/Books/2016/White_book_export_UKR_2016.pdf(in Ukr.).

Published

2020-04-22

Issue

Section

Papers

Most read articles by the same author(s)