Public Performance Evaluation: from the International Debate to the Italian Legal Context

Authors

  • Irina Dmitrievna Dokalskaya University of Udine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14666/2194-7759-8-1-004

Keywords:

Public administration, Performance evaluation, Decision-making policies, Management of expenditures, Legal procedure

Abstract

In recent years, public administration has experienced a period of strong pressure for change, innovation and modernization that has led in an increasing emphasis on measuring and reporting of results. Still public sector reforms continue to preoccupy governments all over the world, since the controversies remain a problem with the integration of decisions concerning the use of the budget means allocated to the results obtained. Because of modernization reforms, the structural foundation of public organizations has changed in many countries. As part of NPM reforms, public organizations have adopted (or trying to) private sector-inspired management techniques, with the declared intention of improving both the quality and productivity of services. The primary cause of this situation have been the growing needs from citizens of services and policies in terms of quality, that public authorities have had and will have to satisfy with increasingly scarce resources. Considering the necessity of greater understanding of the economic and financial performance, this paper discusses the possible modalities, the experiences and the most appropriate processes needed to achieve the strategic and policy objectives for maintaining and improving the quality of services, ensuring the effectiveness of administrative function.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Irina Dmitrievna Dokalskaya, University of Udine

Irina Dokalskaya

Ph.D., Project manager at Leonid Srl

Innovative start up - research company for the

innovations and improvements processes

e-mail: dokalska@yandex.ru

References

Abdel-Maksoud A., et al. (2015). The Use of Performance Information in Strategic Decision Making in Public Organizations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol.28, No.7, pp.528-549.

Ammons, N., and Rivenbark, W. (2008). Factors Influencing the Use of Performance Data to Improve Municipal Services: Evidence from the North Carolina Benchmarking Project. Public Administration Review, Vol.68, No.2, pp.304-318.

Andrews, M., and Hill, H. (2003). The Impact of Traditional Budgeting Systems on the Effectiveness of Performance-based Budgeting: A Different Viewpoint on Recent Findings. International Journal of Public Administration, Vol.26, No.2, pp.135-155.

Borgonovi, E. (1998). Formare la Dirigenza per Riformare la Pubblica Amministrazione. LAVORO E SICUREZZA SOCIALE. Francoangeli.

Cope, G.H. (1987). Local Government Budgeting and Productivity: Friends or Foes? Public Productivity Review, Vol.10 (3), pp.45-57.

Cornett, C. (1998). California’s performance budgeting pilot project: A view from the legislative. Cal-Tax Digest, February.

Garsombke, H.P., and Schrad, J. (1999). Performance measurement systems: Results from a city and state survey. Government Finance Review, February.

Gilmour, J.B., and Lewis, D. (2006). Does Performance Budgeting Work? An Examination of the Office of Management and Budget’s PART Scores. Public Administration Review, 66(5), pp. 742-752.

Hood, C. (1995). The “New Public Management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting Organization and Society, Vol.20 (2-3), pp.93-109.

Hvidman, U., and Andersen, S. (2015). Perceptions of Public and Private Performance: Evidence from a Survey Experiment. Public Administration Review, Vol.76, No.1, pp.111-120.

Kaplan, Robert S.; Norton, David P. (September 1993). "Putting the Balanced Scorecard to Work". Harvard Business Review.

Kroll, A. (2015). Exploring the Link Between Performance Information Use and Organizational Performance: A Contingency Approach. Public Performance and Management Review, Vol.39, No.1, pp.7-32.

Kroll, A., and Moynihan, Donald P. (2015). Does Training Matter? Evidence from Performance Management Reforms. Public Administration Review, Vol.75, No.3, pp.411-420.

Lee, R.D., Jr. (1997). A Quarter Century of State Budgeting Practices. Public Administration Review, 57(2), pp. 133-140.

Melkers, J., and Willoughby, K. (1998). The State of the States: Performance-Based Budgeting Requirements in 47 out of 50. Public Administration Review, 58(1), pp. 66-73.

Moullin, M. (2007) 'Performance measurement definitions. Linking performance measurement and organisational excellence', International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance,20:3,pp. 181-183.

Ngacho, C., and Das, D. (2015). A Performance Evaluation Framework of Construction Projects: Insights from Literature. Project Organisation and Management, Vol.7, No.2, pp.151-173.

Nuti, S. (2008). La Valutazione per la Governance del Psr. Salute e Territorio, Vol.166, pp.53-64.

Ongaro, E. (2009). Public management reform and modernization. Trajectories of administrative change in Italy, France, Greece, Portugal and Spain. Edward Elgar, 2009, pp.316.

Osborne, D., Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Plume. New York.

Poister, T.H., and McGowan, R.P. (1984). The Use of Management Tools in Municipal Government: A National Survey. Public Administration Review, Vol.44 (3), pp.215-223.

Poister, T.H., and Streib, G. (1999). Performance Measurement in Municipal Government: Assessing the State of the Practice. Public Administration Review, Vol.59 (4), pp.325-335.

Poister, T.H., and Streib, G. (2005). Elements of Strategic Planning and Management in Municipal Governments: Status after Two Decades. Public Administration Review, Vol.65 (1), pp.45-56.

Pollitt, C., Bouckaert, G. (2000). Public Management Reform: a Comparative Perspective. Notes form supporting the international conference on modernization and state reform.

Poocharoen, O.-O., and P. Ingraham (2003). “Integration of Management Systems in Government Performance Project,” Paths to Performance in State and Local Government: A Final Assessment from the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs (Syracuse: Maxwell School).

Potì, B., and Cerulli, G. (2010). La Valutazione Ex-post di Uno Strumento di Politica della Ricerca Industriale: Modello Analitico, Processo di Realizzazione, Eterogeneità degli Effetti. Ceris-CNR, Roma.

Rutherford, A., and Meier, Kenneth, J. (2014). Managerial Goals in a Performance-Driven System: Theory and Empirical Tests in Higher Education. Public Administration, Vol.93, No.1, pp.17-33.

Snell, R., and Hayes, K. (1993). Performance budgeting and the states. Presented to the Nebraska Legislative Appropriations Committee, London, NB.

Valotti, G., Galli, D., Orlandi, A., Rota. (2010). La Misurazione e la Valutazione della Performance nella PA Centrale. SDA Bocconi School of Management.

Valotti, G. et al. (2012). Il Livello di Diffusione del Performance Management tra I Dirigenti Pubblici delle amministrazioni Centrali. SDA Bocconi School of Management.

Published

2019-11-14

How to Cite

Dokalskaya, I. D. (2019). Public Performance Evaluation: from the International Debate to the Italian Legal Context. Journal Global Policy and Governance, 8(1), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.14666/2194-7759-8-1-004

Issue

Section

Papers