Globalization, international intervention and the assignment of blame
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14666/2194-7759-7-2-003Keywords:
states, moral responsibility, global practices, UN interventions.Abstract
Critical theorists dwell on the pressing issue of how states and multilateral organizations actually become agents who assign moral responsibilities among themselves. A promising, yet insufficient approach to the issue considers that these collective agents are constituted inside ethical practices of responsibilities dominated by a power inequality amongst them. I argue that such approach fails to consider the extent to which the dynamic interaction of old and new political actors in a globalized context affects these practices and allows for inclusiveness and fluidity in the allocation of blame. The argument is pursued by analyzing the forms by which this dynamic interaction has been affecting the narrative and practice of UN interventions, particularly in Iraq and Kosovo.
Downloads
References
- Allawi, A., 2007. The occupation of Iraq: winning the war, losing the peace. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Beardsworth, R. 2015. From ethical to political responsibility in a globalized age. Ethics & International Affairs 29, No. 1.
- Charvet, J. & Kaczynska-Nay, E. 2008. The liberal project and human rights: the theory and practice of a new world order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Chesterman, S., 2004. You, the People: the United Nations, transnational administration, and State-building. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Coleman, D., 2003. The United Nations and Transnational Corporations: from an international to a ‘beyond-state’ model of engagement. Global Society, Vol. 7, No. 4.
- Connolly, W. 1991. Identity/difference: democratic negotiations of political paradox. Ithaca: NY: Cornell University Press.
- Connolly, W., 1995. The Ethos of Pluralization. MN: University of Minnesota.
- Erskine, T., 2003. Assigning responsibilities to institutional moral agents: the case of states and ‘quasi-states’. In: T. Erskine ed. Can institutions have responsibilities? Collective moral agency and international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Frost, M., 2003. Constitutive theory and moral accountability: individuals, institutions and dispersed practices. In: T. Erskine ed. Can institutions have responsibilities? Collective moral agency and international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Frost, M., 2004. Can dispersed practices be held ethically accountable? Global Society, 18:1.
- Frost, M. 2009. Global ethics: anarchy, freedom and international relations. London: Routledge.
- Hoover, J., 2012. Reconstructing responsibility and moral agency in world politics. International Relations Theory 4:2.
- Hoover, J. 2014. Moral practices: assigning responsibility in the international criminal court. Law and Contemporary Practices, Vol. 76.
- ICISS (International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty). 2001. The responsibility to protect. Ottawa: The International Development Research Centre.
- Jackson, R., 1990. Quasi-states: sovereignty, international relations and the third world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Lemay-Hébert, N., 2012. Everyday Legitimacy and International Administration: Global Governance and Local Legitimacy in Kosovo. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 7:1.
- Linklater, A., 2007. Critical theory and world politics: citizenship, sovereignty and humanity. London: Routledge.
- Narten, J., 2008. Post-conflict peacebuilding and local ownership: dynamics of external-local interaction in Kosovo under United Nations administration. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 2:3.
- Obudsperson Institution in Kosovo, 2005. Fifth Annual Report 2004-2005, Prishtina, 11 July.
- Rawls, J., 1999. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- UN (United Nations), 1995. General guidelines for peace-keeping operations, UN: Department of peacepkeeping operations.
- UN (United Nations), 2000. Report of the panel on United Nations operations. UN: Department of peacekeeping operations.
- UN (United Nations), 2003. Security Council Resolution 1500, adopted in August 2003.
- UN (United Nations), 2004a. Secretary-General (SG) report pursuant to paragraph 24 of resolution 1483 (2003) and paragraph 12 of resolution 1511 (2003), 5 August 2004. S/2004/625.
- UN (United Nations), 2004a. Secretary-General (SG) report pursuant to paragraph 30 of resolution 1546 (2004), 3 September 2004. S/2004/710.
- UN (United Nations), 2004b. Secretary-General (SG) report pursuant to paragraph 30 of resolution 1546 (2004), 8 December 2004. S/2004/959.
- UN (United Nations), 2005. Secretary-General (SG) report pursuant to paragraph 30 of resolution 1546 (2004), 7 March 2005. S/2005/141.
- UN (United Nations), 2007. Secretary-General (SG) report pursuant to paragraph 30 of resolution 1546 (2004), 7 March 2007. S/2007/330.
- UN (United Nations), 2009a. Secretary-General (SG) report pursuant to paragraph 6 of resolution 1830 (2008), 20 February 2009. S/2009/102.
- UN (United Nations), 2009b. Secretary-General (SG) report pursuant to paragraph 6 of resolution 1830 (2008), 30 July 2009. S/2009/393.
- UN (United Nations), 2012. Secretary-General (SG) report pursuant to paragraph 6 of resolution 2001 (2011), 11 July 2012. S/2012/535.
- UN (United Nations), 2013. Third report of the Secretary-General (SG) pursuant to paragraph 6 of resolution 2061 (2012), 11 July 2013. S/2013/408.
- UN (United Nations), 2009. Security Council Resolution 1244, 10 June 2009. S/RES/1244, paragraph 11.
- United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK), 2001. On a constitutional framework for provisional self-government in Kosovo, Regulation 2001/9, Prishtina, 15 May.
- United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK), 2006. On the ombudsperson institution in Kosovo, regulation 2006/06, Prishtina, 11 July 2006.
- Weiss, T., 2013. Global governance: why? what? whither? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
The authors when submitting their papers endorse and give permission as well to the Publisher Transition Academia Press to publish the article/paper in print and/or electronic format. Article/paper is defined as the final, definitive, and citable Version of Record, and includes the accepted manuscript in its final form, including the abstract, text, bibliography, and all accompanying tables, illustrations, data.
If/when an article is accepted for publication, Author will be asked to transfer copyright of the article to Transition Academia Press. Transition Academia Press will retain copyright of all published material and reserves the right to re-use any such material in any print and/or electronic format. Author willing to retain their copyright from the Editors might request a fair condition, on the base of a bilateral agreement.