The Conflict In Nagorno-Karabakh Within The International Scenario


  • Walter Morana Master’s Degree in International Relations at LUISS Guido Carli University



Armenia, Azerbaijan, Nagorno-Karabakh, EU, Russia, Four-Day War


In April 2016, Azerbaijan and Armenia resumed their conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh, reawakening tensions that had not been settled since the first years of the Soviet Legacy and, most of all, the end of the 1992-94 war. The first part of the present article aims at investigating the main historical and political reasons behind this “frozen conflict”. In order to reach this goal, the author will analyze the main issues in support of the status quo in the area, such as the Turko-Russian influence, the role of the European Union (EU) and the situation of minorities and IDPs. The article also offers an analysis of the Minsk Group, originally formed by the OSCE for conflict prevention and resolution in the territory, and proposes new perspectives to overcome the power games affecting its current structure and activity. Particularly, in the conclusion, the author promotes the benefits of an exercise of soft power such as a ground-level cooperation between the EU and Azerbaijan. Especially if placed within a wider reform of the European Neighborhood Policy (ENP), this promotion of structural reforms in Nagorno-Karabakh might represent a valuable model to look at within the relations entertained by the EU with its Eastern Partners.


Alieva, L. (2015). The European Neighborhood Policy and Azerbaijan: When Soft Power and Security are Tightly Related. In Inayeh, A. and Forbrig, J. Reviewing the European Neighborhood Policy: Eastern Perspectives. Washington: The German Marshall Fund of the Unites States, Europe Policy Paper 4/2015, p. 16.

Armenian National Committee of America (2015). US Ambassador to OSCE Defends Turkey’s Role in Karabagh Peace Talks. [Online] Available:

Azatutyun (2010). Karabakh Armenian Army ‘Preparing for War’. [Online] Available: Retrieved on 16 November 2016,

BBC (2016). Nagorno-Karabakh’s Cocktail of Conflict Explodes Again. [Online] Available: http://www.

Bloed, A. (1997). The OSCE Main Political Bodies and their Role in Conflict Prevention and Crisis Management. In Bothe, M., Ronzitti, M., Rosas, A. The Maintenance of Peace and Security. Conflict prevention, Crisis Management and peaceful Settlement of Disputes, Kluwer Law international, pp. 43-44.

Broers L. (2016). The Nagorny Karabakh Conflict: Defaulting to War. London: Chatham House, pp. 14-15.

Chatham House (2016). The Nagorny Karabakh Conflict. Chatham House Research Paper, p. 14.

Council on Foreign Relations (2017). Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict. [Online] Available:!/conflict/nagorno-karabakh-conflict.

CSE (December 1994). Budapest Document 1994.Towards a Genuine Partnership in a New Era. Budapest: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, p. 5.

Dalipi, S. (2016). Kosovo: A False Pretext for Russian Regional Paternalism. In Iliria International Review, 6, 121.

Mankoff, J. (2017). Ukraine: Out of the Shadow of the Bear. [Online] Available:

Delcour, L. (April 2015). In Need of a New Paradigm?. Eastern Partnership Review, No. 20, p. 9.

EU Commission, “Implementation of the European Neighborhood Policy in Azerbaijan Progress in 2014 and Recommendations for Actions”, SWD(2015) 64, 25 March 2015.

EU Parliament, “European Parliament resolution of 18 April 2012 containing the European Parliament’s recommendations to the Council, the Commission and the European External Action Service on the negotiations of the EU-Armenia Association Agreement (2011/2315(INI))”, P7_TA(2012)0128, 18 April 2012.

Eurasianet (January 2017). Finding the Next Flashpoint in US-Russian Relations. [Online] Available:

European Dialogue (2013). Russia-Azerbaijan: An Ambivalent Partnership. [Online] Available:

European Friends of Armenia (EuFoA, 2015). Collection of War Threat Statements by President Ilham Aliyev and Other Azerbaijani Officials. [Online] Available:

Hansen, G. (1998). Humanitarian Action in the Caucasus: A guide for Practitioners. The Humanitarianism and War Project and Local Capacities for Peace Project. Providence (USA): Thomas J. Watson Jr. Institute for International Studies, No. 32, p. 13.

Human Rights Without Frontiers International (2011). OSCE Human Dimension Implementation Meeting”, HDIM.NGO/0285/11.

International Crisis Group (2011). Armenia and Azerbaijan: Preventing War. Policy Europe Briefing, 60, pp. 3-7.

International Crisis Group (2016). Nagorno-Karabakh: new Opening, or More Peril?. Europe report No. 239, p. 14.

Kambeck, E. Ghazaryan , S. (2013). Europe’s Next Avoidable War. Nagorno-Karabakh. Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 214-215.

Khachatrian, H. (2009). Armenia and Azerbaijan: OSCE Wants Civil Society Groups to Help Karabakh Peace Process. [Online] Available: shtml.

Kucera, J. (April 2016). Karabakh Fighting Highlights Azerbaijan’s New Israeli Weapons. [Online] Available:

McVay, K. (2012). Self-Determination in new context: the Self-determination of refugees and forced migrants in international law. Merkourios Utrecht Journal of International and European Law, 28, p. 50.

Mehtiyev, E. (2004). Perspectives of Security Development in South Caucasus. Baku: Peace and Conflict Resolution Center, p. 282.

Minasyan, S. (2011). The Quest for Stability in the Karabakh Conflict. In PONARS Eurasia, No. 188, p. 2.

Mkrtchyan, T. (2003). Democratization and the Conflict on Nagorno-Karabakh. Turkish Policy Quarterly, No. 3, p. 4.

Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2008). Nagorno Karabakh Republic: History and Current Reality. [Online] Available:

Nichol, J. (2014). Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia: Political Developments and Implications for U.S. Interest. Congressional Research Service, 7-5700, p. 44.

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). Statement by the Co-Chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group (2017). [Online] Available:

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). Survey of OSCE Field Operations (2016), p. 32.

Peerlo-Freeman, S., Fleurant, A., Wezeman, P., Wezeman, S. (April 2016). Trends in World Military Expenditure, 2015. Stockholm: SIPRI Fact Sheet, p. 5.

Reuters (2016). Russia Styles Itself Lead Mediator in Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict. [Online] Available:

Ronzitti, N. (2014). Il conflitto del Nagorno-Karabakh e il Diritto Internazionale. Torino: G. Giappichelli, p. 59.

Sammut, D. (2011). After Kazan, a Defining Moment for the OSCE Minsk Process. Rome: Istituto Affari Internazionali, IAI Working Papers 11, pp. 2-8.

Sargsyan, A. H. (2013). Nagorno-Karabakh: Obstacles to a Negotiated Settlement. In CSS Analysis in Security Policy, No. 131, p. 2.

Shiriyev, Z. (2016). The Four-Day War: New Momentum for Nagorno-Karabakh Resolution?. [Online] Available:

SIPRI (2016). The Trend in International Transfers of Major Weapons, 1950-2015. [Online] Available:

The Armenian Weekly (2014). Armenia-US Relations: Unfulfilled Promise. [Online] Available:

The Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (2005). About the First Population Census of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic 2005. Stepanakert, p. 20.

Trend News Agency (2015). Azerbaijan proposes to include Germany, Turkey in OSCE Minsk Group. [Online] Available:

Trend News Agency (2015). Azerbaijan to increase Spending on Defense Sphere in 2016. [Online] Available: //

UN General Assembly, “The three options for self-determination”, UN Doc 1541 (XV), A/RES/1541, December 1960, Principle VIII.

UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). Azerbaijan: Analysis of Gaps in the Protection of Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs). European Commission, October 2009, p. 7.

Wolff, S. (2007). The European Union and the Conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh Territory. Centre for International Crisis and Management and Conflict Resolution, University of Nottingham. Berlin: Report for the Committee on Member States’ Obligations Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. [Online] Available:

World Bank (2016). The Impact of China on Europe and Central Asia. Washington: World Bank ECA Economic Update, p. 77.