Master-Slave Dialectic and Russian Way of Industrial-Postindustrial Transition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14666/2194-7759-5-1-008Keywords:
Social development, Knowledge, Anxiety, Russia, EconomyAbstract
In social sciences, the modeling of industrial-postindustrial transition preserves its topical character. In this context, Russian society demonstrates the transition of industrial society into postindustrial or knowledge-based society, which allowed constructing innovative economy. The essence of processes within development of knowledge-based society and innovative economy depends on so-called Master-Slave dialectic. In Europe, Master-Slave dialectic caused the leading role of scientists. In Russia, scientists depended on Government and played the secondary role in economy. As a result, an author discussed the social forms, which caused the modern social progress, for instance, the future of European democracy in interpretation by William Outhwaite
Downloads
References
Aristotle (350BC/2015) Politics. https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/a/aristotle/a8po/contents.html Accessed 30 October 2015.
Beck U (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
Buckley R (2012) Rush as a Key Motivation in Skilled Adventure Tourism: Resolving the Risk Recreation Paradox. Tourism Management 33(4): 961–970.
Bychkova O, Chernysh A, Popova E (2015) Dirty Dances: Academia-industry Relations in Russia. Triple Helix 2: 13.
Chernikova I, Chernikova D (2014) Knowledge' Concepts in the Knowledge Society and in Technoscience. Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya 26(2): 114-121.
Davies P, Chapman S, Leask J (2002) Antivaccination Activists on the World Wide Web. Archive Diseases in Childhood Volume 87: 22-25.
Drucker P (1969) The Age of Discontinuity. Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd.
Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L (1998) The Endless Transition: a “Triple helix” of University-industry-government Relations. Minerva 36: 203–208.
Freeman C (1982) Innovation as an Engine of Economic Growth: Retrospect and Prospects. Tübingen, J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), pp. 1-32.
Fuchs C (2013) Capitalism or Information society? The Fundamental Question of the Present Structure of Society. European Journal of Social Theory November, 16(4), pp. 413-434.
Fynn-Paul J (2008) Tartars in Spain: Renaissance Slavery in the Catalan City of Manresa. Journal of Medieval History 34(4), pp. 347-359.
Giddens A, (1999) Risk and Responsibility. Modern Law Review 62(1): 1-10.
Giovannella C (2014) Smart Learning Eco-Systems: “Fashion” or “Beef”?. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society 10(3): 15-23.
Glaeser E, Berry CR (2006) Why are Smart Places Getting Smarter?. [Online]
Available at: http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/var/ezp_site/storage/fckeditor/file/pdfs/centers-programs/centers/taubman/brief_divergence.pdf Accessed 21 October 2015.
Heath M (2008) Aristotle on Natural Slavery. Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy 53(3):243-270.
Hegel G (1977) Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Higgins-Desbiolles F (2006) More than an Industry: The Forgotten Power of Tourism as a Social Force. Tourism Management 27: 1192-1208.
Hornidge AK (2007) Knowledge Society. Vision & Social Construction of Reality in Germany & Singapore. Münster: Lit-Verlag.
Hottois G (1984) Le Signe et la Technique (La Philosophie à L'épreuve de la Technique). Paris: Aubier.
Innerarity D (2013) Power and Knowledge: The Politics of the Knowledge Society. European Journal of Social Theory 16(1): 3-16.
Kain PJ (2005) Hegel and the Other: A Study of the Phenomenology of Spirit. New York: Suny Press.
Kaplan S, Vakili K (2015) TheDouble-edged Sword of Recombination in Breakthrough Innovation. Strategic Management Journal 36: 1435–1457.
Knight D (2009) The Making of Modern Science. Science, Technology, Medicine and Modernity 1789-1914. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Kulikov S (2014) Discretization of Social Space and Paradigms in Sociology. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya 365(9): 13-18.
Lane R (1966) The Decline of Politics and Ideology in a Knowledgeable Societ. American Sociological Review 31(5): 649-662.
Largent MA (2012) Vaccine: The Debate in Modern America. Baltimore (Maryland): Johns Hopkins University Press.
Latour B (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lyon JR (2008) Fathers and Sons: Preparing Noble Youths to be Lords in Twelfth-century Germany. Journal of Medieval History 34(3): 291-310.
Marx K (1898/1995/2009) Value, Price and Profit. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1865/value-price-profit/ Accessed 1 November 2015.
Meek RL (1954) Adam Smith and the Classical Concept of Profit. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 1(2): 138-153.
Offit PA (2011) Deadly Choices: How the Anti-Vaccine Movement Threatens Us All. New York: Basic Books.
Outhwaite W (2014) The Future of European Democracy. European Journal of Social Theory 17(3): 326-342.
Palmer C (2002) 'Shit Happens': The Selling of Risk in Extreme Sport. The Australian Journal of Anthropology 13(3): 323-336.
Prytkov VP (2012) Knowledge Society and Problem of Science Development. Teoriya i Praktika Obshchestvennogo Razvitiya 11: 39-45.
Schedler A (2012) Perspectives on Politics. Measurement and Judgment in Political Science 10(1): 21-36.
Smith ND (1983) Aristotle's Theory of Natural Slavery. Phoenix 37(2): 109-122.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
The authors when submitting their papers endorse and give permission as well to the Publisher Transition Academia Press to publish the article/paper in print and/or electronic format. Article/paper is defined as the final, definitive, and citable Version of Record, and includes the accepted manuscript in its final form, including the abstract, text, bibliography, and all accompanying tables, illustrations, data.
If/when an article is accepted for publication, Author will be asked to transfer copyright of the article to Transition Academia Press. Transition Academia Press will retain copyright of all published material and reserves the right to re-use any such material in any print and/or electronic format. Author willing to retain their copyright from the Editors might request a fair condition, on the base of a bilateral agreement.
