Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

EU-Japan EPA a “Stumbling Block or a Stepping Stone” toward Multilateralism for Food and Beverages

Maria Bruna Zolin, Martina Mazzarolo, Junko Kimura

Abstract


In an increasingly regionalized world, both intra-regional and inter-regional trade agreements have flourished in the EU and in Asia, in particular with Japan, which is the world’s fourth largest national economy and, therefore, has a key role as trader and investor within the global dynamics (European Commission, 2017e) with the aim of creating networks to facilitate trade and thus boost the regional economy, especially after the financial crisis at the end of the 1990s (Amighini et al., 2016) and the global crisis of 2008. Asia has been experiencing a notable increase in its regional share of global GDP and this trend is expected to continue. Therefore, it is very important for the EU to ensure good trade relations with Asia.
The new EU-Japan trade agreement expected to be in force in 2019 (MOFA, 2018b) is going to have a strong impact upon trade between EU and Japan, especially with regard to food products, by recognizing their special status and offering protection to 210 European products on the Japanese market and to 56 Japanese products on the European market.
The main aim of this paper is to establish whether this agreement represents a first step for a wide recognition at global level of GI products – given that they are still a matter of dispute within the WTO – or whether it is a single act designed not to affect international trade.


Keywords


Regional Trade Agreement; Food Trade; Geographical Indications; EU; Japan 

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amighini A, Borghi E, Helg R, Tajoli L, Berkofsky A, Khandekar G, Nelson P, (2016). Trade and economic relations with Asia. Directorate – General for External Policies, Policy Department, European Parliament

Asia Regional Integration Center (ARIC), (2018). Free Trade Agreements. https://aric.adb.org/fta-country. Accessed January 2018

Blakeney M, (2014). The protection of geographical indications. Law and practice. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014

Baldwin R, (2004). Stepping Stones or Building Blocs? Regional and Multilateral Integration. Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva, 10 September 2004. http://hei.unige.ch/~baldwin/PapersBooks/SteppingStonesOrBuildingBlocks.pdf. Accessed May 2018

Caputo V, Aprile MC, Nayga RM, (2011). Consumers’ Valuation for European food quality labels: Importance of Label Information Provision. pp 1-12 in Proc. EAAE Int. Congr., Zurich, Switzerland.

European Commission, (2013). Geographical Indications. http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/accessing-markets/intellectual-property/geographical-indications/. Accessed on January 2018

European Commission, (2015). Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment of the Comprehensive Trade and Investment Agreement between the European Union and Japan. Directorate – General for Trade, European Commission. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/april/tradoc_153344.pdf. Accessed February 2018

European Commission, (2016). Doha Development Agenda. http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/eu-and-wto/doha-development-agenda/index_en.htm. Accessed May 2018

European Commission, (2017a). 100 European geographical indications set to be protected in China http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-17-1507_en.htm. Accessed January 2018

European Commission, (2017b). An introduction to the EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/july/tradoc_155715.pdf. Accessed January 2018

European Commission, (2017c). The Agri-food Trade Statistical Factsheet, EU-Japan. Directorate – General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/trade-analysis/statistics/outside-eu/countries/ agri-food-japan_en.pdf. Accessed January 2018

European Commission, (2017d). The Countries and Regions - Japan. Directorate – General for Trade, European Commission http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/countries /japan/. Accessed February 2018

European Commission, (2017e). The EU-Japan Agreement Explained. Directorate – General for Trade, European Commission http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/in-focus/eu-japan-economic-partnership-agreement/agreement-explained/. Accessed February 2018

European Commission, (2017f). Database on GIs protected in the EU for spirits drinks (E-Spirits Drinks) http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/spirits/. Accessed December 2018

European Commission, (2017g). File on GIs protected in the EU for aromatized wines (Aromatized Wines) https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/quality/documents-links/pdf/rgi-arom atised-wine-products_en.pdf. Accessed on December 2018

European Commission, (2018a). Database of Origin and Registration (DOOR). http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/quality/door/. Accessed December 2018

European Commission, (2018b). Database on GIs protected in the EU for wines (E-BACCHUS). http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/markets/wine/e-bacchus/. Accessed December 2018

European Commission, (2018c). The Agri-food Trade Statistical Factsheet, EU-Japan. Directorate – General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/trade-analysis/statistics/outside-eu/countries/ agrifood-japan_en.pdf. Accessed December 2018

European Commission, (2018d). Client and Supplier Countries of the EU28 in Merchandise Trade. Directorate – General for trade, European Commission. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/september/tradoc_122530.pdf. Accessed December 2018

FAO, (2018). Codex Alimentarius standard terms. http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/codex-texts/list-standards/en/. Accessed February 2018

Grunert KG, (2005). Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand. European Review of Agricultural Economics, Volume 32, Issue 3, 1 September 2005, Pages 369–391 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurrag/jbi011. Accessed February 2018

Heydon K, Woolcock S, (2009). The rise of Bilateralism. United Nation University Press.

International Market Bureau, (2010). The Japanese Consumer Behaviour, Attitudes and Perceptions toward Food Products. Market Analysis Report, 2010. Agriculture and Agri-food Canada. https://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/market-prices-and-statistics/trade-statistics/pubs/japan _consumer_report_en.pdf. Accessed May 2018

IRI (Information Resources Inc), (2017). Shopper-Insights-Reports https://www.iriworldwide.com/en-GB/insights/IRI-Shopper-Insights-Reports. Accessed May 2018

Kimura J, (2017). GI practices and effects in Japan. Presented at Geographical Indication (GI) and Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA): Practices and Effects of GIs in EU, Italy and Japan, International Symposium of Research Institute for Innovation Management, November 24th 2017

Lesser C, (2007). Do bilateral and regional approaches for reducing technical barriers to trade converge towards the multilateral trading system? OECD Trade Policy Working Paper, n. 58, Paris

Mashayekhi M. and Ito T, (2005). Multilateralism and regionalism, the new interface. UNCTAD, Geneva.

MAFF (Ministry of Agriculture, Foresty and Fisheries) of Japan, (2018). Information websites on Japan’s Geographical indications. Available at: https://gi-act.maff.go.jp/en/register/ (Accessed on February, 2018).

MOFA (Ministry of Foreign Affairs), (2017). Japan-EU Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA). http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/economy/page6e_000013.html. Accessed May 2018

MOFA (Ministry of Foreign Affairs), (2018a). Economy of Japan. http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/economy/fta/index.html. Accessed January 2018

MOFA (Ministry of Foreign Affairs), (2018b). Economy of Japan http://www.mofa.go.jp/files/000013835.pdf. Accessed May 2018

NTA (National Tax Agency) of Japan, (2018). Japan Approves 139 EU Proposed GIs for Wine and Spirits. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service – GAIN (Global Agricultural Information Network) Report No JA8003. https://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Japan%20Approves%20139%20EU-Proposed%20GIs%20for%20Wine%20and%20Spirits_Tokyo_Japan_1-19-2018.pdf Accessed February 2018

Nicolas F, (2008). EU - ASEAN: Prospects for a Free Trade Agreement in Andreosso-O’Callaghan, B. and M. B. Zolin (eds) Asia and Europe: Connections and Contrasts, Cafoscarina Editrice: Venice, 2008

Rajan RS, Sen R, (2005). The New Wave of FTAs in Asia: Implications for ASEAN, China and India. ADB Volume on Asian Economic Cooperation and Integration. Manila: Asian Development Bank, pp.123-160.

Zolin MB and Andreosso-O’Callaghan B, (2012). The Korea-EU FTA: new Prospects for and Patterns of Agricultural and Agri-food Trade?. Journal of Global Policy and Governance 1:129 DOI 10.1007/s40320-012-0020-1




DOI: https://doi.org/10.14666/2194-7759-7-2-002

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




"Journal Global Policy and Governance" ISSN online 2194-7740 / ISSN print 2194-7759

All publishing rigths reserved to © Transition Academia Press. Executive editor: Prof. Dr. Giorgio Dominese