The “Socialization” of Maritime Global Governance and Taiwan Perceiving the Benefits

Authors

  • Leonard Hammer University of Arizona, The Arizona Center for Judaic Studies email

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14666/2194-7759-6-2-004

Keywords:

Maritime Global Governance, Socialization, Taiwan, Global Process, Global Policy

Abstract

Certain maritime global governance frameworks exist and can at times even be effective. Yet, serious implementation matters and dire environmental circumstances persist. Control mechanisms are mainly in the hands of states or outmoded international organizations facing off against powerful economic intermediaries engaged in exploitation and driven by strong demand from export markets. Political interests also weaken the system, such as disallowing important maritime actors like Taiwan from taking a part in the process. Given that maritime global governance is constantly shifting due to a host of changing processes, proper governance requires structural alteration as well as temporal accountability.
A socialization context for maritime global governance, that emphasizes partnership models incorporating both private and public actors (such as market-based bodies with civil society actors to inform and direct regulatory bodies), can not only improve maritime governance but also allow for participation by Taiwan. Including a wider range of stakeholders like media, politicians, interest groups, and consumers along with an assistive reference to new forms of technologies, can result in activating infrastructures that combine varying interests (like economic and environment) and result in a more effective form of maritime global governance. At the same time, it can open the door for Taiwan to effectively join in environmental initiatives and international projects relating to maritime governance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Hammer, L. (1). The “Socialization” of Maritime Global Governance and Taiwan Perceiving the Benefits. Journal Global Policy and Governance, 6(2), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.14666/2194-7759-6-2-004

Issue

Section

Papers